Technique and asceticism in Sloterdijk’s colossal space
Keywords:
Asceticism, sphere, space, Sloterdijk, techniqueAbstract
The study discusses the notions of asceticism, spatiality and immunization within the framework of Sloterdijk’s theory of spheres. In this sense, this philosophy –a Nova Scientia of the contemporary world- would describe the physiognomy of a “technical man” in the mode of an existence of the being-with-the-world type. The German’s project, that is, an ontology that defines us as beings called to constitute intersubjective relationships impregnated with affectivity, spirituality and security, necessarily demands our performance as acrobats of technology. Unlike Nietzsche’s axiological asceticism, Sloterdijk’s post-Christian ascetology, should be understood as the variety of a modern theory of secularization. This ascetic practice corroborates the connection between the micro-spaces and macro-spaces that man has constructed for himself in the form, at the same time, of a spiritual and material technology. It is no longer a question, as in Heidegger, of man’s inner space, but of the outer, the colossal.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, A. (2017). Peter Sloterdijk’s general ascetology. Critical Horizons, 18(4), 333-346. doi: 10.1080/14409917.2017.1374914
Berman, M. (1995). El reencantamiento del mundo. Santiago: Cuatro Vientos.
Cordua, C. (2008). Sloterdijk y Heidegger: La recepción filosófica. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales.
Dávila, J. (2001). ¿Ultrahumanismos? Signos Filosóficos, (6), 113-132. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/343/34300604.pdf
Dolina, A. [El culto profano] (1 de agosto de 2017). El ascetismo (Alejandro Dolina) [video]. Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdudaPjWPQQ&t=438s
Ernste, H. (2018). The geography of spheres: an introduction and critical assessment of Peter Sloterdijk’s concept of spheres. Geographica Helvetica, 73(4), 273-284. doi: 10.5194/gh-73-273-2018
Galparsoro, J. (2019). La filosofía como antropotécnica no biomédica: Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, (63), 55-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1225
Garbini, F. (2018). Peter Sloterdijk’s spherical communication. MATRIZes, 12(2), 311-316. doi: 10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i2p311-316
Hasler, J. (2015). Contribuciones de Kepler a la continuidad y transformación de la tradición de la música de las esferas. Per Musi, (32), 171-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/permusi2015b3206
Kepler, J. (1994). El secreto del universo. Madrid: Altaya.
Luce, S. (2015). El acróbata en los tiempos del neoliberalismo: Un comentario sobre Peter Sloterdijk. Soft Power, 2(1), 143-149. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2514
Maureira, M. (2016). Posthumanismo: Más allá de antropotécnica y nomadismo. Cinta Moebio, (55), 1‐15. Recuperado de https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/cmoebio/n55/art01.pdf
Oosterling, H. (2007). Interest and excess of modern man’s radical mediocrity: Rescaling Sloterdijk’s grandiose aesthetic strategy. Cultural Politics, 3(3), 357-380. doi: 10.2752/175174307X226898
Raschke, C. (2013). Peter Sloterdijk as “First Philosopher” of globalization. Journal for Cultural & Religious Theory, 12(3), 1-19. Recuperado de https://jcrt.org/archives/12.3/raschke.pdf
Sloterdijk, P. (2003). Esferas I. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P. (2006a). Esferas III. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P. (2006b). Normas para el parque humano: Una respuesta a la carta sobre el humanismo de Heidegger. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P. (2012). Has de cambiar tu vida: Sobre antropotécnica. Valencia: Pre‐Textos.
Spremo, M. (2015). Sloterdijkova Kristalna Palača. Anthropos: Casopis za Psihologijo in Filozofijo ter za Sodelovanje Humanisticnih, 45(1/2), 91-101.
Sylla, B. (2015). Tecnofobia vs. Tecnofilia – sobre Heidegger e Sloterdijk. Ekstasis: Revista de Hermenêutica e Fenomenologia, 4(1), 13-25. doi: 10.12957/ek.2015.16310
Triviño, J (2018). Aclarando el claro: Una reflexión sobre “La domesticación del Ser” de Sloterdijk. Universitas Philosophica, 35(70), 173-205. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.uph35-70.acrs
Van Tuinen, S. (2007). Critique beyond resentment: An introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s Jovial Modernity. Cultural Politics, 3(3), 275-306. doi: 10.2752/175174307X226861